Kinetically Locked-in Colloidal Transport in an Array of Optical Tweezers
Abstract.
We describe measurements of colloidal transport through arrays of micrometer-scale potential wells created with holographic optical tweezers. Varying the orientation of the trap array relative to the external driving force results in a hierarchy of lock-in transitions analogous to symmetry-selecting processes in a wide variety of systems. Focusing on colloid as a model system provides the first opportunity to observe the microscopic mechanisms of kinetic lock-in transitions and reveals a new class of statistically locked-in states. This particular realization also has immediate applications for continuously fractionating particles, biological cells, and macromolecules.
Depending on the balance of forces, a particle driven across a corrugated potential energy landscape either flows with the driving force or else becomes locked in to a symmetry-preferred route through the landscape. The emergence of kinetically locked-in states whose transport properties are invariant over a range of control parameters characterizes many systems and is referred to variously as phase-locking, mode-locking and stochastic resonance. Examples arise in the electromigration of atoms on crystal surfaces (1), in flux creep through type-II superconductors (2); (3), in flux tunneling through Josephson junction arrays (4), and in electron transport through charge density waves and two-dimensional electron gases (5). Related problems abound in the theory of chemical kinetics and glass formation.

Despite their ubiquity, kinetically locked-in states and transitions among them have been observed directly only in numerical simulations. Their presence in experiments has been inferred indirectly from their influence on collective large-scale properties such as the magnetoresistance and Hall conductance of superconductors and two-dimensional electron gases. Consequently, most theoretical studies have addressed the collective transport properties of strongly coupled systems whose internal interactions modify the influence of the modulated potential and the external driving force. How kinetic lock-in affects single-particle transport has received far less attention.
This Letter describes observations of a hierarchy of kinetically locked-in states in the microscopic trajectories of individual colloidal particles flowing classically through large arrays of optical tweezers. Unlike previous studies on other systems which have found that locked in states correspond to deterministically commensurate trajectories through the potential energy landscape, our observations also reveal a new class of statistically locked-in states. The locked-in states' ability to systematically and selectively deflect particles' trajectories suggests that optical trap arrays will be useful for continuously fractionating materials in suspension.
Previous studies (6) have created optical potential energy landscapes with static interference patterns and studied their influence on the equilibrium phase behavior of strongly interacting colloidal monolayers. The present study extends this approach to explore colloidal kinetics in adjustable arrays of discrete potential wells.
Our system, shown schematically in Fig. 1, consists
of colloidal silica spheres in diameter (Bangs Labs
Lot # 4258) dispersed in a 20
-thick layer of deionized water
sandwiched between horizontal glass surfaces.
These spheres are
considerably denser than water and readily sediment into a monolayer
about 2
above the lower wall (7).
The edges of the sample volume are sealed to form a flow cell, with
access provided by two glass tubes bonded to holes passing through the
upper glass wall.
These tubes also serve as reservoirs for colloid,
water, and clean mixed-bed ion exchange resin. Their ends are
connected to continuous streams
of humidified Ar gas which
minimize the infiltration of airborne contaminants and enable us to
drive the colloid back and forth through the channel.
Blocking one of the gas streams causes a pressure imbalance which forces the
dispersion through the sample chamber and past the
field of view of a 100
NA 1.4 oil-immersion
objective mounted on an Olympus IMT-2 microscope base.
Steady flows of up to
can be sustained in this way for about ten minutes.
We use precision ditigal video microscopy (8) to track the individual spheres' in-plane motion with a resolution of 10 nm at 1/60 sec intervals. The resulting trajectory data allow us to monitor the spheres' progress through potential energy landscapes that we create with light.
Our optical potential landscapes are created with the holographic optical
tweezer technique (9); (10) in which a single beam
of light is formed into arbitrary configurations of optical traps by a
computer-designed diffractive beam splitter.
Each beam created by the
diffractive optical element (DOE) is focused by the objective lens
into a diffraction-limited spot which acts as an optical tweezer
(11) capable of stably trapping one of the silica spheres
against gravity and random thermal forces.
For the present experiments, we created a planar
array of optical traps on 2.4
centers using light from a frequency-doubled Nd:YVO
laser
operating at 532 nm.
The traps are focused into the plane of the
monolayer to avoid displacing spheres vertically as they flow past.
Each trap is powered by about
, and their
intensities vary by
percent from the mean, as determined by
imaging photometry.
Rotating the DOE through an angle
, as shown in
Fig. 1,
rotates the array of traps
relative to the flow,
, by the same amount,
without otherwise affecting the traps' properties
(10).
If the Stokes drag due to the flowing fluid greatly exceeds the
optical tweezers' maximum trapping force, then colloidal particles
flow past the array with their trajectories unperturbed. Conversely,
if the trapping force dominates, then particles fall irreversibly into
the first traps they encounter. Our observations are made under
intermediate conditions for which trapping and viscous drag are
nearly matched and particles hop readily from trap to trap.
Our silica spheres enter the hopping state for flow speeds
in the range
.
The monolayer's areal density is low enough that typically only one
or two spheres are in the array at any time.
Their separations are large enough
that hydrodynamic coupling between spheres should be negligible (12).




Figure 2 shows the superimposed
trajectories of
300 particles flowing through a section of the
field of view which includes one corner of the optical tweezer array.
The flow drives spheres directly
from left to right across the field of view,
with small lateral deviations
resulting from Brownian fluctuations.
Those spheres passing within about 1.5
of
the optical traps are drawn into the array's
rows and follow them to their ends.
In this case, the
rows are aligned with the bulk flow,
and the traps' principal influence is to herd particles
into well-defined channels and to suppress their
transverse fluctuations.
The appearance of such
commensurate trajectories through the array
defines a channelling state, named by analogy to ion channeling
through conventional crystals.
While plotted trajectories help to visualize individual
particles' interactions with the optical traps,
a complementary view of the array's overall influence is
offered by the relative probability of finding a
particle within
of
at some time after it enters
the field of view.
Figure 3(a) shows data
compiled from the trajectories of 18,601 spheres obtained
under the same conditions as Fig. 2.
They reveal that
spheres are nearly seven times more likely to be found in the rows of
traps than at any point in the bulk flow outside of the array.
The correspondingly low probability for finding spheres between the
rows and the comparatively subtle modulation along the rows
reveals that the time required for a sphere to hop from trap to trap
along a row is so much shorter than the time needed for a transverse jump
that the spheres essentially never leave the
rows. Once the
spheres have hopped through the ranks of traps, they return to the
bulk flow, their trajectories eventually blurring into each other
through diffusion.

![[10]](mi/mi30.png)




Figure 3(b) shows data from
the same sample but with the traps oriented at
with respect to the flow.
Even though the flow is no longer aligned with the lattice,
the spheres still closely follow the array's
rows.
As a result, the channeling trajectories are
systematically deflected away from the flow's direction and
leave a distinct shadow downstream of the array.
This insensitivity to orientation distinguishes the
-commensurate state as being kinetically locked-in
and confirms the conjecture (2); (5) that kinetic
lock-in with systematic deflection can occur as a single-body process
rather than requiring the elasticity of an interacting monolayer.
When the trap array is rotated even further to ,
as in Fig. 3(c), the particles no longer channel along
the [10] direction.
Although the spheres still spend more time in individual traps than in
the bulk, they no longer follow clearly defined paths
from one trap to another.
Rotating to , as in Fig. 3(d),
reveals another channeling state with particles following the array's
diagonal
rows.
Rotating away from 45
demonstrates this channelling state also to be locked-in.
In principle, additional locked-in
channelling states should appear at other angles corresponding to
commensurate paths through the array (13).
In a system with square
symmetry, commensurate orientations occur for rational values of
.
To quantify the degree to which the array deflects spheres' trajectories,
we compare the velocity a
particle attains while moving inside the array to its velocity
in the bulk flow. In particular, Fig. 4(a) shows
the mean normalized transverse
component of the in-array velocity
which is roughly analogous
to the Hall coefficient in electron transport.
The monotonically positive slope of
in the range
characterizes
the domain over which the
state is locked-in, with increasing
rotation yielding systematically increasing deflection.

After the deflection reaches its maximum at ,
it decreases non-monotonically
to zero at the commensurate orientation
.
Rotating the array beyond this
point results in retrograde deflection.
In contrast, no change of sign is predicted
for the Hall coefficient of a periodically modulated
two-dimensional electron gas with increasing magnetic field, although
this may reflect the choice of 6-fold rather than 4-fold symmetry for
the potential landscape in the available simulations (5).
If indeed such
sign reversal can be obtained through simple patterning of an
electronic system, the effect would be unprecedented and could have
widespread applications in magnetic data retrieval.
Beyond , trajectories become locked-in
to the commensurate channeling state along the
direction.
The deflection
returns to zero in this state when
the
rows align with the external force at
.
Quantitatively indistinguishable results for
were obtained for particles moving with different speeds in the range
.
While is independent of
over the entire
range of hopping conditions, such is not the case for the other
component,
. As can be seen from Fig. 4(b) and
(c), the normalized longitudinal velocity is strongly correlated
with
.
Although
structure in
may reflect aspects of particles' hopping
mechanisms, much as the magnetoresistance does for electron transport,
it is masked in the available data by variations in
.
The and
locked-in states are characterized by
the positive slope they induce in
.
That other smaller features also correspond to locked-in states
becomes apparent in another representation of the data.
Simulations (2)
have demonstrated that kinetically locked-in states appear
as plateaus in the
dependence of the
ratio
of in-array
speeds along the perpendicular
and
directions.
Comparison with predictions for the circle map and
related dynamic systems further suggests that the
widest plateaus should be centered at the simplest rational
values of
and that the overall
hierarchy of locked-in states
should take the form of a
Devil's staircase with
increasing rotation (2); (13).
The corresponding representation of our data appears in
Fig. 5.
As expected, the data
display a series of kinetically locked-in states, with plateaus
in
corresponding to regions of positive
slope in
.
The large plateaus around
and
correspond to the
and
locked-in states.
However, the higher-order plateaus between
and
are not centered
on simple rational values of
.
Instead, the commensurate orientations at
,
, and
correspond to transitions between plateaus.
Furthermore, the associated plateaus include non-channeling states
such as Fig. 3(c) which nonetheless
are locked in.

![[10]](mi/mi30.png)
Non-channeling transport in the plateaus of Fig. 5 suggests a previously unrecognized class of statistically locked-in states that are distinct from deterministically channeling states. Their absence from measurements on perfect atomic crystals and idealized molecular dynamics simulations suggests that they may result from quenched disorder in our optically-defined potential energy landscape. The pattern of plateaus reflects symmetries in the potential energy landscape and so would not be affected by the individual potential wells' shapes (13). Their statistical nature suggests a possible role for random thermal forcing. How disorder gives rise to the distribution of steps observed in Fig. 5 poses an outstanding challenge.
Beyond providing an experimental context in which to study the microscopic mechanisms of kinetic lock-in, the techniques introduced for this study also constitute a practical method for continuously fractionating mesoscopic materials. Particles in a heterogeneous suspension that interact more strongly with optical traps will be pushed to one side by an appropriately tuned array of traps. Particles that interact less strongly will pass through the same array undeflected. The deflected and undeflected fractions then can be collected in separate microfluidic channels and passed on to additional stages of optical traps for further stages of fractionation.
We are grateful to Franco Nori, Charles Reichhardt, Woowon Kang and Sidney Nagel for enlightening conversations. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through Grant Number DMR 9730189 and by the MRSEC program of the NSF through Grant Number DMR-9880595. Additional support was provided by a grant from Arryx, Inc. The diffractive optical element used in this work was fabricated by Gabriel Spalding, Steven Sheets and Matthew Dearing to a design computed by Eric R. Dufresne (10).
References
-
(1)
O. Pierre-Louis and M. I. Haftel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 048701 (2001).
-
(2)
C. Reichhardt and F. Nori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 414 (1999).
-
(3)
M. Baert, V. V. Metlushko, R. Jonckheere, V. V. Moshchalkov, and Y. Bruynseraede, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3269 (1995); K. Harada, O. Kamimura, H. Kasai, T. Matsuda, A. Tonomura, and V. V. Moshchalkov, Science 274, 1167 (1996); J. I. Martín, M. Vélez, J. Nogués, and I. K. Schuller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1929 (1997); D. J. Morgan and J. B. Ketterson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3614 (1998).
-
(4)
K. D. Fisher, D. Stroud, and L. Janin, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15371 (1999); V. I. Marconi and D. Domínguez, Phys. Rev. B 63, 174509 (2001).
-
(5)
J. Wiersig and K.-H. Ahn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 026803 (2001).
-
(6)
B. J. Ackerson and A. H. Chowdhury, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 83, 1 (1987); M. M. Burns, J.-M. Fournier, and J. A. Golovchenko, Science 249, 749 (1990); K. Loudiyi and B. J. Ackerson, Phys. A 184, 1 (1992); Q.-H. Wei, C. Bechinger, D. Rudhardt, and P. Leiderer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2606 (1998).
-
(7)
S. H. Behrens and D. G. Grier, Phys. Rev. E 64, 050401 (2001a); S. H. Behrens and D. G. Grier, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6716 (2001b).
-
(8)
J. C. Crocker and D. G. Grier, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179, 298 (1996).
-
(9)
E. R. Dufresne and D. G. Grier, Rev. Sci. Instr. 69, 1974 (1998).
-
(10)
E. R. Dufresne, G. C. Spalding, M. T. Dearing, S. A. Sheets, and D. G. Grier, Rev. Sci. Instr. 72, 1810 (2001).
-
(11)
A. Ashkin, J. M. Dziedzic, J. E. Bjorkholm, and S. Chu, Opt. Lett. 11, 288 (1986).
-
(12)
E. R. Dufresne, T. M. Squires, M. P. Brenner, and D. G. Grier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3317 (2000).
-
(13)
E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1993).