Sang-Hyuk Lee and David G. Grier
Department of Physics and Center for Soft Matter
Research, New York University, New York, NY 10003
Date: August 16, 2005
Thermal ratchets employ time-varying potential energy landscapes to break the spatiotemporal symmetry of thermally equilibrated systems (1). The resulting departure from equilibrium takes the form of a directed flux of energy or materials, which can be harnessed for natural and practical applications. Unlike conventional macroscopic machines whose efficiency is reduced by random fluctuations, thermal ratchets actually require noise to operate. They achieve their peak efficiency when their spatial and temporal evolution is appropriately matched to the scale of fluctuations in the heat bath.
Most thermal ratchet models involve locally asymmetric space-filling potential energy landscapes, and almost all are designed to operate in one dimension. Most practical implementations have exploited microfabricated structures such as interdigitated electrode arrays (2,3), quantum dot arrays (4), periodic surface textures (5,6), or microfabricated pores for hydrodynamic drift ratchets (7,8). Previous optical implementations have used a rapidly scanned optical tweezer to create an asymmetric one-dimensional potential energy landscape in a time-averaged sense (9,10), or a time-varying dual-well potential with two conventional optical traps (11,13,12).
This article describe a broad class of optical thermal ratchets that exploit the holographic optical tweezer technique (14,17,18,19,20,16,15) to create large-scale dynamic potential energy landscapes. This approach permits detailed studies of the interplay of global spatiotemporal symmetry and local dynamics in establishing both the magnitude and direction of ratchet-induced fluxes. It also provides a basis for possible practical applications.
Holographic optical tweezers use computer-generated holograms to
project large arrays of single-beam optical traps.
Our implementation (15),
shown schematically in Fig. 1,
uses a liquid crystal spatial light modulator
(SLM) (Hamamatsu X7550 PAL-SLM) to imprint phase-only holograms
on the wavefronts of a laser beam from a frequency-doubled
diode-pumped solid state laser operating at 532 nm
(Coherent Verdi).
This SLM can vary the local phase,
, between 0
and
at each position
in a
grid spanning the beam's wavefront.
The modulated beam is relayed to the input pupil of a
NA 1.4 SPlan Apo oil immersion objective lens mounted in an
inverted optical microscope
(Zeiss S-100TV).
The objective focuses the light into a pattern of optical traps that
can be updated in real time by transmitting a new phase pattern to the
SLM.
The left-most photograph in Fig. 1
shows the focused light,
, from a typical pattern of
holographic optical traps, which is imaged by placing a front-surface
mirror on the sample stage and collecting the reflected light with
the objective lens.
Each focused spot of light in this
array constitutes a discrete optical tweezer (21),
which acts as a spatially symmetric three-dimensional
potential energy well for a micrometer-scale object.
The central image in Fig. 1 shows an aqueous
dispersion of 1.53
diameter colloidal silica spheres (Bangs Laboratories, lot number 5328)
interacting
with this pattern of traps at a projected laser power of 2.5 mW/trap.
Each potential well may be described as a rotationally symmetric Gaussian
potential well (22).
Arranging the traps in closely spaced manifolds separated by a
distance
creates a
pseudo-one-dimensional
potential energy landscape,
,
which can be modeled as
The potential energy landscape created by a holographic optical tweezer array differs from most ratchet potentials in two principal respects. In the first place, the empty spaces between manifolds comprise large force-free regions. This contrasts with most models, which employ space-filling landscapes. The landscape can induce motion only if random thermal fluctuations enable particles to diffuse across force-free regions. Secondly, the landscape is spatially symmetric, both globally and locally. Breaking spatiotemporal symmetry to induce a flux rests, therefore, with the landscape's time evolution. Details of the protocol determine the nature of the induced motion.