Next: About this document ...
Up: Measurement of the Vortex
Previous: Measurement of the Vortex
-
- 1
-
K. Harada et al., Nature 360, 51 (1992).
- 2
-
A. Tonomura, Electron Holography, Vol. 70 of Springer Series in
Optical Sciences (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993).
- 3
-
K. Harada et al., Science 274, 1167 (1996).
- 4
-
T. Matsuda et al., Science 271, 1393 (1996).
- 5
-
J. C. Crocker and D. G. Grier, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179, 298
(1996).
- 6
-
F. P. Preparata and M. I. Shamos, Computational Geometry
(New York, Springer Verlag, 1985).
- 7
-
D. R. Nelson and B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B 19, 2457 (1979).
- 8
-
J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids, 2nd ed.
(Academic Press, London, 1986).
- 9
- K.-C. Ng, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 2680 (1974).
- 10
-
M. Mungan, C.-H. Sow, S. N. Coppersmith, and D. G. Grier,
in preparation (1997).
- 11
-
The Clem model for vortex interactions
(J. R. Clem, J. Low Temp. Phys. 18, 427 (1975))
is more appropriate
for Nb, whose superconducting coherence length is comparable to
its London penetration depth.
The present data set does not offer
sufficient resolution to distinguish its predictions from those
of the London model, however, and we present the simpler
and quantitatively adequate model for clarity.
- 12
-
R. Meservey and B. B. Schwartz, in Superconductivity, ed. R. D. Parks
(New York: Marcel Dekker, 1969) pp. 117-191.
- 13
-
G. S. Park, C. E. Cunningham, B. Cabrerra, and M. E. Huber, Phys. Rev. Lett.
68, 1920 (1992).
- 14
-
G. Blatter and V. Geshkenbein, Phys. Rev. Lett.
77, 4958 (1996);
S. Mukherji and T. Nattermann, Phys. Rev. Lett.
79, 139 (1997).
- 15
-
C. A. Bolle et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 112 (1991);
L. L. Daemen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2948 (1993);
M. M. Doria and I. G. de Oliveira, Phys. Rev. B 49, 6205 (1994);
I. V. Grigorieva et al., Phys. Rev. B 51, 3765 (1995).
David G. Grier
1998-12-08