Manipulation and assembly of nanowires with holographic optical traps
Abstract.
We demonstrate that semiconductor nanowires measuring just a few nanometers in diameter can be translated, rotated, cut, fused and organized into nontrivial structures using holographic optical traps. The holographic approach to nano-assembly allows for simultaneous independent manipulation of multiple nanowires, including relative translation and relative rotation.
Semiconductor nanowires (1); (2) are emerging as versatile building blocks for the assembly and fabrication of a wide range of nanoelectronic and nanophotonic devices (3); (4); (5). To date, the properties of simple nanowire-based devices have been determined using nanowires deposited on the surface of a substrate either at random or else by directed assembly controlled by flowing fluids or electric fields (6); (7); (8). These latter approaches represent a significant advance over random assembly, yet remain limited in that the end-to-end registry and three-dimensional (3D) orientation of nanowires are not controlled, thus precluding the rational assembly of more complex architectures with interesting and potentially useful functional properties. Here we describe the use of holographic optical traps (HOTs) (9) as a general approach for parallel manipulation and assembly of nanowires in 3D. The HOT technique can create hundreds of independently controlled optical traps that can manipulate mesoscopic objects in 3D (10); (11). We demonstrate that cadmium sulfide (CdS) nanowires with cross-sections at least as small as 20 nm can be isolated, translated, rotated and deposited onto a substrate with HOT arrays. We also exploit spatially localized photothermal and photochemical processes induced by the well-focused traps to cut nanowires and to fuse junctions. These capabilities have been used to assemble nontrivial structures, thus demonstrating the substantial potential for assembling and subsequently investigating the functional properties of complex and previously inaccessible structures.
We synthesized CdS nanowires by the laser ablation technique
via the gold catalyzed vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) growth mechanism
(1). The nanowires range from 50 to 150 ![]()
in
diameter with lengths ranging from 10 to 40 ![]()
. The nanowires
were then suspended in ethanol by mild sonication.
Deionized water was added to the suspension (20% v/v) prior to the
experiments to prevent the rapid evaporation of the solution, which
can lead to the deposition of nanowires on the bottom glass surface.
These samples then were charged into slit pores roughly 40 ![]()
thick formed by bonding the edges of #1 glass coverslips to the
surfaces of microscope slides.
Sealed nanowire samples were mounted for observation and manipulation
on the stage of a Nikon TE-2000U microscope
outfitted with a
NA 1.4 Plan Apo oil-immersion objective.
This lens is used both to collect bright-field images of the dispersed nanowires
and also to focus light from a continuous wave (CW)
frequency-doubled Nd:YVO
laser operating at 532 ![]()
(Coherent Verdi) into optical traps (Fig. 1(a)).
To create a large number of diffraction-limited optical traps, we
utilized the holographic optical tweezer (HOT) technique, as described
previously. Our implementation uses a liquid crystal spatial light
modulator (SLM) (Hamamatus X8260 PPM) to imprint a computer-designed
phase-only hologram encoding the desired array of traps (11)
onto the laser beam's wavefronts.
Each trap in the array can be translated independently in three
dimensions by projecting a sequence of holograms encoding the sequence
of intermediate trapping patterns. Interactive assembly was performed
with
a BioRyx 200 holographic optical trapping system (Arryx, Inc.), also operating at
532 ![]()
, with an integrated MicroPoint
pulsed laser cutter (Photonic Instruments)
operating at 440 ![]()
.
In our approach, nanowires dispersed in a fluid medium on the
stage of a light microscope are organized into structures
by projecting computer-designed
patterns of diffraction-limited optical traps using
the dynamic HOT technique
(9); (10); (11) (Fig. 1).
HOT micromanipulation relies on a generalization of the single-beam
optical gradient force traps known as optical tweezers
that can capture mesoscopic objects in 3D (12).
An individual optical tweezer is not effective for trapping
highly asymmetric structures, however,
and appears to be incapable of moving our semiconductor nanowires at
laser powers below 0.1
.
Increasing the power to increase the trapping force
also induces rapid heating and
the evolution of vapor bubbles whenever the
focal point passes through a nanowire, and to visible changes in the
nanowires themselves, including bending, formation of nodules, and
even scission.
This is consistent with heating due to absorption in the substantial
photon flux passing through the micrometer-scale focal volume.
To exert more force on the nanowires while minimizing radiative damage, we
project large numbers of holographic optical traps along the length
of each nanowire.
The image in Fig. 1(d)
shows a freely floating
semiconductor nanowire ca. 15 ![]()
long
captured by an array of
holographic optical traps with an inter-trap
separation of 0.4 ![]()
.
Once aligned and localized in the array of traps, the nanowire
can be translated at speeds up to
by moving the array across
the field of view (e.g., Fig. 2(a))
or by moving the sample stage relative to the array.
This upper bound can be used to estimate the optical trapping force.
The drag on a cylinder of length
and radius
traveling through an unbounded fluid of viscosity
at low
Reynolds number is
(13)
| (1) |
where
.
This sets a lower limit on the optically applied force of
0.2 fN/trap for the ca. 80 ![]()
diameter CdS
nanowire used in this measurement.
The actual drag is substantially enhanced by the
need to satisfy no-flow boundary conditions at the
nearby coverslip, which
is
away from the nanowire's center.
To lowest order in
, the corrected drag is (14),
| (2) |
which would increase the estimate for the trapping force by at least a factor of two.
Although these estimates suggest that a single optical tweezer should be able to manipulate a nanowire, a point-like trap's symmetry allows a nanowire to rotate into an orientation that minimizes drag, and thus to escape from the trap. The spatially extended trapping potential provided by the holographic optical tweezer array maintains the nanowire's orientation and thus makes controlled translation possible. As few as two traps can capture and translate a nanowire, although more stable trapping is observed for multiple traps arranged in a line. Comparable trapping and orientation control has been demonstrated for single CuO nanorods (15) in a linear optical tweezer created with a cylindrical lens. Our HOT approach offers the additional benefit of manipulating multiple nanowires simultaneously and independently in complex ways, as described below.
Figure 2(a) and the associated video show two
CdS nanowires being manipulated by two arrays of traps projected
simultaneously with a single computer-generated hologram.
One nanowire is held stationary while the second is advanced
in steps of 0.7 ![]()
by projecting an appropriately
designed sequence of holograms at 1
intervals.
Similar sequences also can be used to rotate
a nanowire precisely, as shown in Fig. 2(b).
The video of this process demonstrates
that both the separation and relative
orientation of two
nanowires can be controlled in this way, thereby providing the
two basic capabilities required for building complex architectures.
The phase holograms used to create holographic optical traps also
can modify the individual beams' wavefronts to create
optical micromanipulators that do not require active updating
to process nanowires.
Specifically, a single static optical tweezer can be
transformed into an
optical vortex (18); (19); (20); (21) by imposing
a helical phase profile
onto the
trapping laser's wavefront.
Here,
is a polar coordinate transverse to the
beam's axis and
is an integer winding number defining the
wavefronts' helicity.
The effect of this modulation is to transform a point-like optical
tweezer into a ring-like trap whose radius scales linearly with
winding number (21); (22), and whose photons each
carry an orbital angular momentum,
, in addition to
their intrinsic spin angular momentum (23),
that can be transferred to objects illuminated by the
ring of light (24); (25); (26); (21).
The resulting torque causes the nanowire in Fig. 3
to rotate,
even though the trap itself is static.
Arrays of optical vortices can be used to rotate large numbers
of nanowires rapidly in parallel, although with less precise angular
control than dynamic arrays of conventional optical tweezers.
We also have used HOT arrays to investigate other modes of
manipulation
that could be important for assembling complex structures.
First, a trapped nanowire can be translated along the optical axis
to the surface of a substrate.
If the nanowire has not been stabilized, for example with surfactant,
this causes the nanowire to be deposited irreversibly through its
van der Waals interaction with the substrate.
In cases where the nanowires are stabilized, increasing the laser
power
in the trap array still can yield irreversible and site-specific
deposition of nanowires with controlled orientation.
Second, tightly focused optical traps at higher powers can be
used to cut nanowires, as shown in Fig. 4(a).
Here, a 0.5
CW optical tweezer focused on a nanowire for
ca. 100 ![]()
acts as an optical scalpel. Finer cuts requiring
substantially less power can be achieved with short laser pulses
at shorter wavelengths (27).
Once nanowires have been cut to length and organized into specific
configurations, forming junctions between them
is critical for transforming these structures into
electronic and photonic devices of the types that have been
recently investigated and proposed
(3); (7).
The HOT approach opens up new opportunities for creating such
junctions.
For example, the translation and rotation operations can be used
to assemble two freely diffusing nanowires into a T-junction.
Applying a high-power pulse (100 ![]()
, 1
) irreversibly
fuses the nanowires to form a rigid T-junction that freely diffuses
in solution when the HOTs are removed (Fig. 4(b)).
These results highlight further the
power of our approach; that is, it can be used to translate and rotate
nanowires in a reversible manner, and also to irreversibly modify
them through site-specific fusion, deposition and cutting.
Lastly, we have combined all of the manipulation steps described
above to assemble a substantially more complex structure, as shown
in Fig. 5.
This interactive assembly was performed with a BioRyx 200 holographic
optical trapping system.
Figure 5(a) shows a nanowire segment being translated
toward a pair of fused nanowires held in an optical tweezer
array.
After being translated and rotated into
position, the additional segment is fused to the larger structure with a
0.5
pulse of light distributed over 10 traps lasting 2
.
Next, the longer
nanowire
in the partially completed structure is cleanly cut
(Fig. 5(b)) with a short-wavelength laser pulse
(100 ![]()
,
,
).
The resulting free-floating nanowire segment is captured with multiple
traps, and brought back to the optically trapped structure
(Fig. 5(c)) to form a rhombus.
Finally, additional laser pulses fuse the nanowires into a stable
closed structure (Fig. 5(d)).
In summary, the results presented here demonstrate that holographically projected arrays of optical traps can be used to manipulate and assemble semiconductor nanowires into precisely organized two-dimensional and three-dimensional structures. In the future, it should be possible to optimize this process by tuning the laser wavelength to enhance the optical trapping force. The approach also will become substantially faster and more highly parallel with advances in holographic trapping technology. Optical assembly of functional subunits will facilitate hierarchical fabrication of larger systems, through processes that might exploit complementary techniques such as chemically-directed self-organization. The HOT technique also can be extended to bring together diverse nanoscale building blocks such as nanotubes (28) or nanoparticles (29), to utilize their unique properties in conjunction with those of nanowires. In addition, dynamic systems can be created by exploiting the dynamically configurable nature of optical traps. We believe that the exciting opportunities provided by the HOT technique for nanofabrication with unprecedented and exquisite spatial control will be crucial for creating integrated and functional nanosystems in the future.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (DBI-0233971 and DMR-0450878) and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N00014-04-1-0591; GA9550-05-1-0444).
References
-
(1)
A. M. Morales and C. M. Lieber, “A laser ablation method for the synthesis of crystalline semiconductor nanowires,” Science 279, 208–211 (1998).
-
(2)
J. T. Hu, T. W. Odom, and C. M. Lieber, “Chemistry and physics in one dimension: Synthesis and properties of nanowires and nanotubes,” Acc. Chem. Res. 32, 435–445 (1999).
-
(3)
C. M. Lieber, “Nanoscale science and technology: Building a big future from small things,” MRS Bulletin 28, 486–491 (2003).
-
(4)
L. Samuelson, “Self-forming nanoscale devices,” Materials Today 6, 22–31 (2003).
-
(5)
L. W. Zhong, “Nanostructures of zinc oxide,” Materials Today 7, 26–33 (2004).
-
(6)
C. C. Huang, C. F. Wang, D. S. Mehta, and A. Chiou, “Optical tweezers as sub-pico-newton force transducers,” Opt. Comm. 195(1-4), 41–48 (2001).
-
(7)
X. F. Duan, Y. Huang, Y. Cui, J. F. Wang, and C. M. Lieber, “Indium phosphide nanowires as building blocks for nanoscale electronic and optoelectronic devices,” Nature 409, 66–69 (2001).
-
(8)
D. Whang, S. Jin, Y. Wu, and C. M. Lieber, “Large-scale hierarchical organization of nanowire arrays for integrated nanosystems,” Nano Lett. 3, 1255–1259 (2003).
-
(9)
E. R. Dufresne and D. G. Grier, “Optical tweezer arrays and optical substrates created with diffractive optical elements,” Rev. Sci. Instr. 69, 1974–1977 (1998).
-
(10)
J. E. Curtis, B. A. Koss, and D. G. Grier, “Dynamic holographic optical tweezers,” Opt. Comm. 207(1-6), 169–175 (2002).
-
(11)
M. Polin, K. Ladavac, S.-H. Lee, Y. Roichman, and D. G. Grier, “Optimized holographic optical traps,” Opt. Express 13, 5831–5845 (2005). http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-13-15-5831.
-
(12)
A. Ashkin, J. M. Dziedzic, J. E. Bjorkholm, and S. Chu, “Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles,” Opt. Lett. 11, 288–290 (1986).
-
(13)
G. K. Batchelor, “Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary cross-section in Stokes flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 44, 419 (1970).
-
(14)
Y. Takaisi, “Note on the drag on a circular cylinder moving with low speeds in a semi-infiniite liquid bounded by a plane wall,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan 11, 1004–1008 (1955).
-
(15)
T. Yu, F. C. Cheong, and C. H. Sow, “The manipulation and assembly of CuO nanorods with line optical tweezers,” Nanotechnology 15, 1732–1736 (2004).
-
(16)
R. J. Collins, “Mechanism and defect responsible for edge emission in CdS,” J. Appl. Phys. 30, 1135–1140 (1959).
-
(17)
D. M. Banall, B. Ullrich, H. Sakai, and Y. Segawa, “Micro-cavity lasing of optically excited CdS thin films at room temperature,” J. Cryst. Growth 214/215, 1015–1018 (2000).
-
(18)
H. He, N. R. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, “Optical particle trapping with higher-order doughnut beams produced using high efficiency computer generated holograms,” J. Mod. Opt. 42, 217–223 (1995).
-
(19)
N. B. Simpson, L. Allen, and M. J. Padgett, “Optical tweezers and optical spanners with Laguerre-Gaussian modes,” J. Mod. Opt. 43, 2485–2491 (1996).
-
(20)
K. T. Gahagan and G. A. Swartzlander, “Optical vortex trapping of particles,” Opt. Lett. 21, 827–829 (1996).
-
(21)
J. E. Curtis and D. G. Grier, “Structure of optical vortices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 133,901 (2003).
-
(22)
S. Sundbeck, I. Gruzberg, and D. G. Grier, “Structure and scaling of helical modes of light,” Opt. Lett. 30, 477–479 (2005).
-
(23)
L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, “Orbital angular-momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes,” Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185–8189 (1992).
-
(24)
H. He, M. E. J. Friese, N. R. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, “Direct observation of transfer of angular momentum to absorptive particles from a laser beam with a phase singularity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 826–829 (1995).
-
(25)
N. B. Simpson, K. Dholakia, L. Allen, and M. J. Padgett, “Mechanical equivalence of spin and orbital angular momentum of light: An optical spanner,” Opt. Lett. 22, 52–54 (1997).
-
(26)
A. T. O'Neil, I. MacVicar, L. Allen, and M. J. Padgett, “Intrinsic and extrinsic nature of the orbital angular momentum of a light beam,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 053,601 (2002).
-
(27)
A. P. Joglekar, H.-H. Liu, E. Meyhofer, G. Mourou, and A. J. Hunt, “Optics at critical intensity: Applications to nanomorphing,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101, 5856–5861 (2004).
-
(28)
J. Plewa, E. Tanner, D. M. Mueth, and D. G. Grier, “Processing carbon nanotubes with holographic optical tweezers,” Opt. Express 12, 1978–1981 (2004). http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-12-9-1978.
-
(29)
K. Ajito and K. Torimitsu, “Single nanoparticle trapping using a Raman tweezers microscope,” Appl. Spec. 56, 541–544 (2002).