Available in four formats:
Available in four formats:
Available in three formats:
The English edition was published in the UK in July 1998 by
Profile Books
under the title Intellectual Impostures;
it can be ordered on-line from
W.H. Smith
or amazon.co.uk.
It was published in the US in November 1998 by
Picador USA,
an imprint of
St. Martin's Press,
under the title Fashionable Nonsense;
it can be ordered on-line from
Barnes and Noble or
amazon.com.
Click here for the
preface and first chapter
in English.
Lecturers who are considering the book for potential student use may obtain an academic inspection copy: please direct your requests here for UK, Europe and the British Commonwealth, and here for US and Canada.
Translations into
Catalan,
Dutch,
Farsi
,
German,
Hungarian
,
Italian,
Japanese,
Korean,
Polish
,
Portuguese (Brazil),
Portuguese (Portugal),
Spanish
and
Turkish
have been published.
Click here for the
preface
in Portuguese.
Translations into
Chinese (PRC),
Chinese (Taiwan)
and Russian
are in the works. I will post more information
as it becomes available.
For reviews of Impostures Intellectuelles / Fashionable Nonsense, click here.
Click here for the
Table of Contents and Preface.
(Note that this is from my manuscript, not from the published book,
so the page numbers are not exactly right.)
For reviews of Beyond the Hoax,
click here.
Published in French translation,
together with a very interesting preface by Jean Bricmont, by
Éditions Odile Jacob
(September 2005) under the title
Pseudosciences et postmodernisme: Adversaires ou compagnons
de route?.
A slightly modified version of this talk was given at the
Swedish Academy of Sciences in Stockholm on May 27, 2009.
This brilliant essay about religiosity in contemporary India
is eerily relevant to the United States as well.
Here, for instance, is Nanda's response to the idea that we must
"respect" other people's faith:
I happen to believe that indulging people’s irrational beliefs -- like a parent puts up with a child’s follies -- does not add up to “respect”. In my rulebook, the best way to respect people you care about is to treat them as worthy conversation partners who can be persuaded by reason (or who may persuade you with better arguments and evidence). The way I see it, engaging people in an honest and open dialogue about the matters of ultimate concern is to pay them the highest grade of respect that there is.
See also my reply to Saulson's review
(an abridged version of which was published in the July 2009 issue of
Physics Today)
and Saulson's reply.
See also my brief comments
on Bérubé's review.
NYU-- last modified 11 November 2009